Technology businesses in Greater Manchester move fast by default - but the pressure is different to most sectors. You're balancing product velocity with quality, customer expectations, security, and a market that rewards clarity as much as capability. AI can be a genuine advantage here, not as a gimmick, but as a force multiplier across product, engineering, customer success, and go-to-market.
The tech companies that win with AI won't be the ones who "use it everywhere". They'll be the ones who choose a small set of repeatable workflows where AI improves speed and consistency without creating new risk.
Create vertical messaging, proposals, FAQs, and case studies that stay accurate and on-brand.
Softcat (a UK technology company and Microsoft partner) rolled out Microsoft 365 Copilot and reported:
- 85% active regular use among licensed users
- ~20% admin time savings in sales
They also describe using Copilot to speed up post-meeting follow-ups (pulling actions from transcripts), reduce email catch-up time, and improve marketing reformatting work — alongside tightening SharePoint/Teams permissions so Copilot only surfaces what people should access.
Discover more in our AI Hub,
or speak to an AI expert today
Context: You are my product ops assistant at a Greater Manchester software company. We've completed discovery and need a PRD first draft.
Goal: Draft a PRD we can review and refine.
Source: Use only the discovery notes below. If something is missing, list it as an open question (don't guess.
Expectations: Use headings: Problem, User, Goals, Non-Goals, Requirements, Constraints, Risks, Metrics, Open questions. Concise and specific.
Context: We’re preparing sprint planning and need clear user stories.
Source: Use only the PRD excerpt/requirements below — do not invent scope.
Goal: Convert requirements into user stories the team can build.
Expectations: For each story: user story, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and “out of scope”. Keep criteria testable.
Context: We want fast QA coverage without missing edge cases.
Source: Use only the acceptance criteria below.
Goal: Generate a test checklist.
Expectations: Include happy path, negative tests, boundary cases, and abuse cases. Output as a checklist. No assumptions.
Context: We need a v1 technical spec that reduces ambiguity for engineers.
Source: Use only the context and constraints below.
Goal: Draft a spec outline we can review.
Expectations: Headings: Overview, Assumptions, Architecture, Data flows, Security considerations, Error handling, Observability, Rollout plan, Risks, Open questions.
Context: We need to reduce PR cycle time and clarify what happens next.
Source: Use only the PR conversation below.
Goal: Summarise decisions and required changes.
Expectations: Output: Decisions, Required changes, Optional suggestions, Risks, Next actions (owner placeholders). Be precise.
Context: We’re shipping a release and need clear customer-facing notes.
Source: Use only the changes below.
Goal: Draft release notes and a short announcement.
Expectations: Sections: New, Improved, Fixed. Plain English, no internal jargon. Include customer actions required (only if stated).
Context: We want better roadmap decisions using real customer voice.
Source: Use only the feedback snippets below.
Goal: Identify themes and prioritisation signals.
Expectations: Table: Theme, Frequency (low/med/high), Severity, Example quotes, Suggested next step (experiment or product change), Questions to validate.
Context: We want early warning signs and a practical retention plan.
Source: Use only the call notes below.
Goal: Produce a churn-risk summary and recommended actions.
Expectations: Sections: Risk signals, Likely root causes (label as hypotheses), What to ask next, Suggested interventions, Owners by role (CS/Product/Eng), Timeline.
Context: We sell software to multiple sectors in Greater Manchester and need sector-specific messaging that stays technically accurate.
Source: Use only the product description and sector context below.
Goal: Draft a vertical value proposition and objections handling.
Expectations: Output: Headline, 3 benefits, 3 proof points needed, 5 common objections + best responses. No generic claims; flag anything that needs evidence.
Context: We’re formalising AI usage rules for a technology company handling customer data and proprietary IP.
Source: Use only our principles and constraints below.
Goal: Draft a short internal AI policy.
Expectations: Include: approved tools, “never share” data categories, review rules, examples of allowed/not allowed, logging/audit expectations, escalation route. 1–2 pages.
At Apex, we can support you with: